Monday, 19 April 2021

Breaking the Silence - a Booklaunch

In a week when the ambassadors of Georgia and Ukraine have made a blundering effort to interfere with the work of a highly regarded Dublin City University professor of international relations, Donnacha O Beachain, it's nice to have an event to celebrate academic and scholarly vigilance.    In May 2020, Ronit Lentin, David Landy and I published Enforcing Silence: Academic Freedom, Palestine and the Criticism of Israel, a collection of essays by divers hands built in particular around the ways that the Israel lobby or Israel itself has sought to foreclose on dissent and boycott advocacy, frequently veiling such efforts with references to the need to protect academic freedom.  

On Thursday April 22, at 7pm, we are holding an online seminar to celebrate the book and its contributors.  Three of our colleagues - Arianne Shahvisi, John Reynolds and Yara Hawari - will speak on their work and there will be time for questions and discussion.     Everyone is welcome!

Zoom Link: https://tcd-ie.zoom.us/j/6576059321 Meeting ID: 657 605 9321



Enforcing Silence

Academic Freedom, Palestine and the Criticism of Israel

Edited by David Landy, Ronit Lentin, and Conor McCarthy

Situates the academic boycott of Israel in the broader context of academic freedom


Academic freedom is under siege, as our universities become the sites of increasingly fraught battles over freedom of speech. While much of the public debate has focussed on ‘no platforming’ by students, this overlooks the far graver threat posed by concerted efforts to silence the critical voices of both academics and students, through the use of bureaucracy, legal threats and online harassment. Such tactics have conspicuously been used, with particularly virulent effect, in an attempt to silence academic criticism of Israel.
This collection uses the controversies surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a means of exploring the limits placed on academic freedom in a variety of different national contexts. It looks at how the increased neoliberalisation of higher education has shaped the current climate, and considers how academics and their universities should respond to these new threats. Bringing together new and established scholars from Palestine and the wider Middle East as well as the US and Europe, Enforcing Silence shows us how we can and must defend our universities as places for critical thinking and free expression.









Friday, 9 April 2021

How horrible are academics, really?

The Minister for Higher Education Simon Harris (who at least is not quite as idiotic as his predecessor Mary Mitchell O'Connor, now mercifully excised from the Irish political scene) last year announced plans for new legislation on the governance of Irish universities.   The plan, presented as rationalisation (as so often), is to amend the Higher Education Authority Act (1971).   Elements of this proposed reform - hailed by government as the most important change to Irish higher education in 50 years - include a dramatic 'slimming down' of university governing bodies, the empowerment of the Minister to appoint a majority of non-university members to such boards, and legal structures to enable government review of university 'performance'.   

It's a sign of the sorry pass to which relationships between Irish universities, their academic staff and the state have come that such a proposal can even be considered.    The Minister betrays the profound ignorance of the nature of the university institution in general of his peers and his generation in the suggestion that universities need to be governed primarily by non-academic and non-university personnel.  And the posture of the universities shows how weak and ineffective scholars have come to be in representing their work, their interests, their contribution to society as anything other than the unwarranted privileges of whining irrelevant eggheads.  

The very 'idea of the university' is of a collective of independent and self-governing scholars.   Originally as in the case of the University of Bologna, widely reckoned the first university, the independence of scholars obtained particularly in relation to the Church and ecclesiastical powers.   Later, charters of independence were issued for universities by princes, prelates or the towns in which they located.  The first and most famous of these was the  Constituto Habita, adopted at Bologna in 1155, protecting the freedom of a travelling scholar, and conferring on such scholars freedom from reprisal and the right to be tried by their brethren.   This can be understood, therefore, as the foundational document of academic freedom, as we think of it today.  

The point here is that such freedom and the self-governance which flows from and protects that freedom, is fundamental to the notion of what a university is.   The difficulty, nowadays, is that universities have taken on the financial support of modern states and then more recently, as Western states have shrunk in the neoliberal era, universities have been encouraged to manage themselves as businesses and to seek and win the support of private capital.

So now in Ireland, we find the universities caught in a situation of structural contradiction.   The government seeks to enhance the power over universities of non-university and non-academic agents, both from the state and from private corporations, even as it withdraws funding from those same universities.   More control, less money.   

The control is potentially Stalinist in effect.   The government wishes the universities to be 'accountable' even as the monies thereby to be accounted for are becoming less and less.   This is not the first or the only recent government initiative vis-a-vis the universities which has authoritarian characteristics.   Last year, Ms Mitchell O'Connor announced the Senior Academic Leadership Initiative, which provides structures and funding for up to twenty professorships across the Irish university system, application for which will be restricted to women.   Efforts to achieve gender balance are admirable.  A scheme which allows government to reach into the heart of a university and shape the specifics of a core element of policy - recruitment - sets a very dangerous precedent.  

But Irish universities, even Trinity College Dublin, our oldest and most 'prestigious' university, where academic self-governance has been preserved more and for longer than elsewhere, are vulnerable to state meddling.   Academics sorely need to devise ways to explain and represent themselves to the society as a whole, showing that their activities - pedagogical, scholarly, experimental, critical - constitute an inestimable contribution to that society and need to be protected and respected as a public good and a crucial component of democracy itself.

An example of just how brilliantly such arguments can be made comes in the following blogpost by my friend and comrade Conrad Brunstrom, responding a few days ago to Minister Harris's latest announcements.  The link to his blog is posted here with Conrad's permission.   

Thursday, 18 March 2021

At the Mur des Fédérés - remembering the Paris Commune




150 years ago, on March 18, 1871, the Paris Commune was declared.  France, under the benighted 'nephew', Napoleon III, had initiated a foolish 'war of choice' with Prussia in 1870, and had paid the price with the catastrophic defeat at Sedan, which led to the surrender and capture of the Emperor.  The Prussians accepted the surrender of Paris on January 28, 1871 and Adolphe Thiers, leader of the new French government, signed an armistice with the Prussians that disarmed the French Army.

But Paris was protected not by army regulars but by the National Guard.  On March 18, two French Army generals were killed by the  Paris Guard, in a dispute at Montmartre over the control of cannon mounted on the butte, and the city administration, the Commune, refused any longer to accept the authority of the Thiers government. The city's population, during the  Prussian siege, had been winnowed of many of its bourgeois or noble elements, which had deserted the city, while  it had taken in hundreds of thousands of refugees coming from Prussian-occupied regions of France.   The city's proletarian population was already highly politicized, seeking a much stronger level of control of the city's economy.   Among the political watchwords of the time was 'la république démocratique et sociale!', but the city's leftist political movements spanned a wide range of positions, from the 'radical republicans' under Clemenceau, to the followers of Blanqui.   The latter, though a small group (maybe one thousand activists) were armed and disciplined and formed the core of the Commune's leadership.




The Prussians created the opportunity for the Thiers government to assemble an army to retake Paris from the forces of the radicals and the workers.   The Army, under MacMahon, entered Paris on May 21, and ferocious street-fighting followed - la semaine sanglante.  The Tuileries Palace was burned, and then the Hotel de Ville.  Communards captured were summarily executed in the streets of the city.   The final fighting took place in and around the great cemetery of Pere Lachaise, in the northeast of the city.  Two hundred National Guardsmen held the graveyard, but they could not resist the Army as it used cannon to blow open the gates.  Hand-to-hand fighting amidst the graves ensued.   In the early evening, the Army had either killed or captured the Guardsmen.  147 were taken to the wall of the graveyard and executed in short order and without compunction; their bodies were flung into a mass grave at the foot of the wall.   



Estimates of casualties vary, but up to 20,000 Parisians died in the 'Bloody Week' and the events stand as a reminder of the ashen ruthlessness of the forces of French reaction - enabled by their Prussian foe to choke the brief flaring-out of a truly radical and bold new political experiment.  Even today, the Mur des Fédérés is a place both melancholy and stark.  Visiting in mid-winter a couple of years ago, I could feel the silence chill and palpable, as the great city surged just outside.

The Commune is much written about.  Marx penned his marvellous Civil War in France (see below), Zola - so brave in many other respects - denigrated it in La Débacle, and the great English historian of France, Alistair Horne, produced his Fall of Paris.   Commemoration of the Commune was for a long time a fixture in the calendars of the European Left - in Dublin, James Connolly and the Irish Socialist Republican Party used to organise ceremonies  of remembrance, and Connolly wrote about the Commune in The Workers' Republic (see Donal Fallon's brilliant article about the Commune and the Easter Rising below).  To this day, the Mur is a shrine of the French Left, depleted and divided as it now is.




Nowadays, the flame of the Commune and what it might have achieved is carried by writers such as Eric Hazan, or, in a different inflection, the brilliant English Marxist geographer,  David Harvey, whose voluminous writings about 'the capital of the nineteenth century' (Benjamin) constitute a fabulous resource for urban rebels everywhere.

Reading, and remembering: 


Kristin Ross: The contemporary relevance of the Paris Commune




Eric Hazan: 'Paris: the Commune overjoyed'



And Karl Marx


And Jenny Marx


Prosper-Olivier Lissagaray, author of one of the most popular histories of the Commune


From Jacobin:

The Paris Commune Is Still a Beacon for Radical Change






And a review of David Harvey's superb book, Paris: Capital of Modernity


Conor



Friday, 5 March 2021

'The most revolutionary thing one can do is always to proclaim loudly what is happening' - learning from Rosa Luxemburg

 



Today is Rosa Luxemburg's 150th birthday.    Brilliant Polish Marxist, interlocutor of Lenin, Spartacist leader, theorist of imperialism, revolutionary, Rosa Luxemburg remains a burning image of radicalism and the intellectual life lived to the full.   Her conceptualization of strike, of the relation of reform to revolution, and of the pitfalls of national consciousness remain as important now as they were when she was brutally murdered and disposed of by the intransigent German Right.  

 

From Jacobin

Happy 150th Birthday, Rosa Luxemburg

How Rosa Luxemburg Taught Worker-Militants to Think Differently



Sunday, 14 February 2021

Keem Bay - A Beast Approaches

 




When I was little, my mother Lavinia didn't have much money.   She never had a  lot of money but when I was little she was a separated single mum in Sixties Ireland and, though her parents and friends and employers were sympathetic and kind, things were lean.   Very few people that I knew then took foreign holidays - we had one epic sojourn in Washington DC, in the hot summer of 1968, thanks to the great generosity and tolerance of my aunt and uncle, who let us share their tiny flat in Silver Springs for several weeks.    But air travel was a rare and expensive privilege, and holidays were mostly in Ireland.  And for us, that meant Achill.  Achill is the  largest island off the  Irish coast, an island continuation of  the  Corraun peninsula in North Mayo, which pushes west of Mulrany, separating the sunny waters of Clew Bay from the more sombre Blacksod.   

On Achill, we stayed at the Amethyst Hotel, in the middle of Keel village.   The Amethyst was owned and run by Thea and Robert Boyd.  Thea ran the main part of the hotel on the southern side of the road, with many rooms and the extraordinary, almost mediaeval kitchen, and the large and beautiful dining room.  Robert ran the more raffish 'Annex',  which had  rooms but also a bar.   The Boyds were an interesting and attractive couple - highly cultured, humorous and gentle.  Mr Boyd was universally known as Captain Boyd, because of his Irish Army service.   Thea was an old friend of my grandmother's, and this was a draw.  So too was the advice of Susan Howe - now one of America's greatest poets - a dear friend of my mother and of my beloved aunt, who stayed, and painted, at the Amethyst.

The Amethyst was the kind of hotel/guesthouse which is marked profoundly by the personality of its owners.   It got a great deal of repeat custom - at one point, before the  Boyds' tenure it was home to Paul Henry, the artist who maybe more than any other invented 'the West of Ireland'.  People who became friendly with Thea - as my ma did, or was already - got to socialize with her around the large turf fire at one end of the dining room in the evenings.   Thea and Robert were walking repositories of Achill lore and history, a Church of Ireland couple who seemed never to have identified with the Protestant community of Dugort's famous 'colony', the C of I missionary settlement set up by Edward Nangle in the  nineteenth century, with its elegant L-shaped street nestled under the massive east ridge of Slievemore.   

Thea was endlessly generous to me and my mother.  She knew my mother had little money,  and almost certainly gave us reduced rates.  She would pick us up at Castlebar or Westport, when we came down by train (nearly 100 miles round trip from Keel) in her grey Cortina, and she routinely drove us all over the island.   When I had little boy's questions about gulls or cliffs or basking sharks, Thea would answer them with patience and always a slight twinkle in her eye, if there was a hint of oddity or humour in what I  was asking.   

So, thanks initially to the Boyds (and also their son, Ruairi, to whom I owe all my early experiences of proper mountain walking, both in Mayo and in Wicklow), and then to June Fielding, and more recently (i.e. over the last 25 years) to John and Elizabeth Barrett (relatives of the original owners of the Amethyst) of Bervie Guesthouse, also in Keel, Achill is a place imprinted on my imagination and on my soul, if I have one.   Its landforms, smells, buildings, village names, its weather, its rollicking roads with their every bump and rise and fall (and their terrifying Stygian ditches), its fields and bogs - these are part of my mental geography,  my cognitive mapping, and returning to Achill is always like meeting an old and cherished friend.

At the western end of Achill is to be found some of its finest scenery.  This is principally the mountain, or actually massif, of Croaghaun and its attendant ridges, lakes, bays, headlands and spurs.   Croaghaun, about 2200 feet high, is for  my money one of the grandest hills in the country - partly for the very complexity and variety of its topography, and partly because of its great northwest face, a two mile stretch of gaunt steep precipices which drop into the grim Atlantic from its very summits.   I remember the first time I climbed the mountain I went up alone from the western road, on Croaghaun's southern flank, and I went for its spectacular western summit, a dramatic blocky pinnacle of quartzite leaning over the empty dark air of the northwest face.   And there I met two Swiss lads, who were cock-a-hoop at having reached the summit.   We chatted away, and I was very struck at their excitement - after all  they came from the Alps.   But they stared at me when I mentioned this, and gestured around and down to the wrinkled crawling breakers half a mile away at the base of the huge wall and said, We have nothing like this!    Nothing of that combination of rough hill and big sea, which is what makes many places in the West of Ireland just so fine.   

These Swiss climbers would, therefore, be aghast, as  I am, at the resurrected plans of Mayo County Council for the 'development' of Keem Bay, a beautiful small cove on the southwest side of Croaghaun, sheltered under the spine of Moyteogue Head from the open Atlantic.  MCC has announced plans to refurbish the old Coast Watch hut on top of Moyteogue  and to build near it a ridiculous, intrusive and utterly unnecessary 'sky walk', a kind of all-glass box or tube walkway, cantilevered out from the cliff edge, so as to give visitors the sense of walking in mid-air in the most spectacular location imaginable.

Robert Lloyd Praeger, the great doyen of Irish botanists and a spiritual forefather, perhaps, of great recent writers about the West of Ireland like Tim Robinson (the finest writer in Ireland, in recent decades, if you ask me), wrote of Keem and  Moyteogue in his masterpiece The Way That I Went:

... what is perhaps the finest view in Achill can be obtained without the expenditure of energy required for the  ascent of  Croaghaun.  Take the path from Dooagh along the  steep hillside to the lovely sheltered  sandy bay of Keem.  And from there climb up the left-hand slope to the old coastguard watch-house, and walk westward along the edge of the thousand foot-precipice; you'll  obtain changing and ever-wonderful views of the  wild  cliffs of  Achill Head which will remain long in your memory.   

This is the holy place which Mayo County Council, in its Gradgrindian view of the  terrains of Achill, thinks it can 'improve' with its ludicrous 'development'.   It must be stopped.   

Please sign this petition (possibly set up by the brilliant Saoirse McHugh):

 https://www.change.org/p/mayo-county-council-save-keem-bay-achill-island-most-beautiful-beach-in-ireland-from-unnecessary-development?recruiter=false&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=psf_combo_share_initial&recruited_by_id=2de83b30-6bbc-11eb-b19e-4d6c94432ab2


Please also write to Padraig Philbin, at Mayo County Council, to express your feelings at this vandalous and philistine project: pphilbin@MayoCoCo.ie


Conor





Thursday, 11 February 2021

Technologies of the Self

 A few years ago, I was in a restaurant in Manhattan.  Nothing very special - it was my local, on the street where I'd rented a room.  And I was in there one evening, early evening.  The quiet lone man with a fat novel.  I made my order and was reading and waiting.  Chelsea is a good place for people-watching.   

A group of six young Asian women came in. I am not sure if the fact that they were women is pertinent, but I think it probably is.  They were out for a girls' meal and they were going to have a great time.  And this was grand.  What was odd - but it actually is no longer odd - is that the whole time they were in the  restaurant they were looking at their smartphones.  The whole time   And for long periods of time they were entirely silent, such was the rapt attention demanded and received by the little illuminated screens.  Every now and then, one would nudge her neighbour to show her something interesting she'd found or received, on her screen.   

Yes I know, I am now and I was then a middle aged man watching a group of  women in their 20s.  And yes, I will never attain the level of technophilia and social media savvy these women very likely possessed.  I won't say I was appalled at what I saw, as that would be so obvious.  But I was very struck.  I wanted to think: 'But they could be having a great ould natter, about food, men, work, life, clothes'.  And then I had to admit to myself: 'In fact they are having a great time.  This is now what having a great social evening looks like.  They will remember this evening as really fun'.   

I didn't get it. I don't get it.  There is something wrong here, something amiss.  

Here is Marianela D'Aprile, at Jacobin:


Delete Your Fake Account




Conor

Thursday, 28 January 2021

The Danger of Reading/Reading Danger

I have started reading in bed again.  I used not to do it, as I tended to fall asleep almost immediately my head was anywhere near a pillow.   But, though I am sleeping well, I've started reading again.



Mostly, at the moment I am reading Robert Service's life of Lenin.   Service is not a particularly inspiring writer, and I sometimes wonder about his grasp of Marx's ideas.   But for the most part, writing after 1991, he holds in check any Cold Warrior tendencies he might have.  And the life - what a life! - is so dramatic that I find the book utterly gripping.

When not getting  my pulse racing with Vladimir Ulyanov, I am reading sections of Graham Robb's 'adventure history' of Paris, Parisians.  For some reason, I used to think that Graham Robb was a writer stained by the favour of the Daily Telegraph.  Perhaps Home County Tories do like him, but of course that's not his fault.  I don't see anything very adventurous in the book, but the stories he tells are wonderful and well told.  I am a soft touch when it comes to Paris, but the book is a joy, and a kind of compensation for the fact that I haven't been to Paris for nearly two years.  


 

Every so often, I am picking up the Hill/Scarpitti edition of Nietzsche's Will to Power.   A risky thinker, but enthralling, and fatally quotable.    Here he is opening his notebooks:


What has greatness must be spoken of with greatness, cynically and without shame, or not at all.


Dark words, dark times.  


Conor