Tuesday, 11 April 2023
Las mujeres dan valor - Remembering Rachel Corrie
Tuesday, 7 March 2023
The Dark Side of Enlightenment - A Century of the Institut fur Sozialforschung
As Irish society trumpets its modernity, progressivism and liberalism ever more loudly, a 'ruthless criticism of everything now existing' remains an intellectual and scholarly imperative. Irish take-up of the ideas of the famous Frankfurt School, at any of its various stages and manifestations, from Horkheimer to Honneth, has been patchy or sporadic. But the work of this school of critical theory is a huge resource for anyone wishing to cut beneath the Irish Times platitudes that represent serious social and political thinking in Ireland today.
Here is an article, at the excellent Boston Review, by a leading American inheritor of the Frankfurt School legacy, Seyla Benhabib, to mark the centenary:
Below the Asphalt Lies the Beach
Friday, 24 February 2023
Criticism in a Crisis - Thinking Ukraine and Russia
As we pass the anniversary of Russia's recent invasion of Ukraine, it is harder and harder to find space in the public sphere and the public discussion where viewpoints other than the liberal consensus can be expressed. By 'the liberal consensus', I mean the broad tendency in the EU and the United States, as far as I can see, to consider the crisis to be one entirely of Russia's making; to be without context or history or backstory; to be driven by a single psychopathic leader, Vladimir Putin; and to be resolvable principally by war. Ukraine must prevail, this line of thinking goes, Putin must fall, Russian military capacity must be destroyed, and a nice new leader must take power in Moscow.
The problem with this line of thinking is its utterly un-reflexive nature. At no point in this ideological framework is any blundering or culpability or greed or strategizing by the United States, other great powers, NATO or the European Union considered or even imagined. Specious historical analogies are drawn - so we have Michael McDowell (not a stupid man, by any means) comparing the current moment to - wait for it - Munich 1938. This is what passes for intelligent and historically-minded 'analysis' in the Irish Times, the Irish 'newspaper of record'. Or we get the same Irish Times carrying an ignorant and superficial 'critique' of John Mearsheimer's writing about Russia and Ukraine by the Financial Times columnist (and Orwell Prize winner, God help us) Gideon Rachman, which ignores Mearsheimer's valuable scholarship and portrays him as a 'useful idiot' for Russia and China. One can only conclude that the likes of McDowell and Rachman are 'useful idiots' for NATO and the United States' proxy war against Russia.
Amidst the wreckage on the intellectual landscape, the odd beacon still stands. Mearsheimer himself is attractively irrepressible. His colleague Stephen Walt likewise. In Britain, Anatol and Dominic Lieven, major historians of Russia and of the former USSR, have been voices of integrity and nuance. Here are articles by each of them.
First, Anatol Lieven in today's Guardian:
And an interview with Dominic Lieven, from December last:
Dominic Lieven: 'It's Against Ukraine's Interest To Take Back Crimea' (rferl.org)
Conor
Monday, 20 February 2023
Blowing Up the Blowhards? - Seymour Hersh on Nordstream
Seymour Hersh is one of America's greatest investigative journalists. He'll always be remembered as the writer who exposed the My Lai massacre of hundreds of Vietnamese civilians by American soldiers in 1968. But his work has continued ever since. For me, his book on the secret Israeli nuclear programme, The Samson Option (1991) has been particularly important but his work has covered multiple issues and crises.
Hersh has now published an article on the destruction of the Nordstream gas pipeline, joining Russia and Germany, last September. We've been told that this action was perpetrated by Russian saboteurs. Hersh is arguing differently. His story has a significant weakness - its dependence on one source. But the flak he has taken in just days since its publication suggests that he has touched a nerve, and penetrated some of the propaganda murk which swirls around the apparent moral and political clarity with which the Ukraine war is discussed.
Here is an interview with Hersh, with hyperlinks to his article, published by Sidecar, the New Left Review blog. It makes interesting reading.
Conor
How to Blow Up a Pipeline
ALEXANDER ZEVIN & SEYMOUR HERSHAn interview with Seymour Hersh.
15 FEBRUARY 2023
An interview with Seymour Hersh.
Wednesday, 15 February 2023
The Political Unconscious of Education - an interview with Jacques Ranciere
Thursday, 27 October 2022
Mike Davis - the real McCoy
First, socialism — the belief that the earth belongs to labor — is my moral being. In fact, it is my religion, the values that anchor the commitments that define my life.
Second, “old school” implies putting in work year after year for the good cause. In academia one runs across people who call themselves Marxists and go to lots of conferences but hardly ever march on a picket line, go to a union meeting, throw a brick or simply help wash the dishes after a benefit. What’s even worse, they deign to teach us the “real Marx” but lack the old Moor’s fundamental respect for individual working people and his readiness to become a poor outlaw on their behalf.
Finally, plain “socialist” expresses identification with the broad movement and the dream rather than with a particular program or camp. I have strong, if idiosyncratic, opinions on all the traditional issues — for example, the necessity of an organization of organizers (call it Leninism, if you want) but also the evils of bureaucracy and permanent leaderships (call it anarchism if you wish) — but I try to remind myself that such positions need to be constantly reassessed and calibrated to the conjuncture. One is always negotiating the slippery dialectic between individual reason, which must be intransigently self-critical, and the fact that one needs to be part of a movement or a radical collective in order, as Sartre put it, to “be in history.” Moral dilemmas and hard choices come with the turf and they cannot be evaded with “correct lines.”
Mike Davis was one of the greatest exemplars of the scholar-agitator of recent times. His death is a huge loss; his work remains a resource to be treasured.
Conor
Here is some material by and about Davis:
Obituaries
The Nation Mike Davis: 1946–2022
The Los Angeles Times
Arellano: Mike Davis’ final email to me reminded me to write, not mourn
A brilliant radical reporter with a novelist’s eye and ain
Tuesday, 25 October 2022
Badiou on Ukraine - a prophet without honour in his own time
Just as the Russian invasion of Ukraine began, in February, I had planned to blog about the possibility of war. I failed to do so - a position of intellectual caution, alas. Writing or speaking in any way critically of Western policy on Ukraine and Russia has proven, unsurprisingly, not to be the best avenue to the quiet or contemplative life.
An exemplar to the contrary, but ahead of his time, was Alain Badiou, the veteran French philosopher and unrepentant Maoist. Here is an article he wrote in 2014 - at the time of the coup (usually known as the Maidan rebellion) which brought Zelensky's predecessor to power in that country. It's well worth revisiting now, as we live with wall-to-wall liberal militancy and mouth-frothing 'I told you so'-ism.
More on this topic soon -
Conor
"A present defaults – unless the crowd declares itself": Alain Badiou on Ukraine, Egypt and finitude
